Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Effel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete; already userfied. Johnleemk | Talk 10:40, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sean Effel

Undisputably true[1] and even a tiny bit controversial[2], but at 141 Google hits, not unambiguously relevant. Started out in userspace[3] and migrated to article. Earnest enough guy, but encyclopedic? Abstain.

Adrian Lamo · (talk) · (mail) · 06:44, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, non-notable and is vanity. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 07:50, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

*Delete per TerenceOng Swatjester 08:02, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

• Userfy, take it back where it started. Message left for user. - Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 22:19, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Terenceong1992. Arbustoo 09:10, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy per JzG. Stifle 15:55, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.