Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sea anenomes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep and of course feel free to redirect. --Tony SidawayTalk 01:44, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

After further review, the outcome of this vote was Redirect. There are no votes to keep this article. - Tεxτurε 15:10, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sea anenomes

Delete. Pretty cute article about anemones that isn't worth merging. Redirect common spelling error? (The author also claims to hold a "copywrite", but I feel as though it doesn't exactly hold up. JDoorjam 00:51, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

  • Well, if it's copyrighted, it's copyvio. So we have a redundant copyvio. Delete, I'm afraid. No redirects — we don't redirect misspellings, do we? That would necessitate an infinite number of pages.—Encephalon | ζ  01:09:57, 2005-08-19 (UTC) I bow before the compelling wisdom of the misslepping redirectors. :) Vote change: Redirect, to sea anemones.—Encephalon | ζ  03:50:21, 2005-08-19 (UTC)
    • we do redirect from common misspellings, particualrly for often mis-spelled terms. DES (talk) 03:42, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
    • We don't generally pre-emptively create redirects for all potential mis-spellings, as we pre-emptively create redirects for pluralizations, different capitalizations, and so forth. But if someone has actually made the mistake and created a duplicate article at the mis-spelled title, then we redirect, on the grounds that if one person did it once, then others are likely to do the same in the future, and the redirect both prevents the whole cycle repeating and edifies readers. Uncle G 05:09:43, 2005-08-19 (UTC)
  • Delete, though I'm tempted to steal the content for my school report. Flowerparty talk 01:18, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect. No need to delete. Plausible misspelling. (I know I'd need to look up the spelling for this one!) Pburka 01:31, August 19, 2005 (UTC)
    • I had to look it up to write the summary. JDoorjam 02:02, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect would be useful in this case. Not generally a fan of redirects for misleppings, but this one is worthwhile. In case of an otherwise no-consensus vote, this may be taken as a delete. -Splash 02:13, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect for sure. I'm a pretty strong speller, but I would probably fumble through two or three mis-spellings of "anenome" before I got it right. Fernando Rizo T/C 02:38, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect. -Sean Curtin 03:00, August 19, 2005 (UTC)
  • merge and redirect Trollderella 03:08, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect as per Pburka or delete if no consensus to redir. DES (talk) 03:42, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect as above. Capitalistroadster 05:00, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect Agree with above.Amren 23:53, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Might I suggest Traswiki to simple english wikipedia as they don't currently have an article on it. The language seems simple enough and it seems like parts of this article could serve as a good start for a simple english one. --Aqua 00:27, August 20, 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect "Anemomes" "Amemones" "Amenones" The word in the title is hard to spell. I'd call this a common enough misspelling. I don't agree with the transwiki-to-simple idea. This page isn't just simple English; it's childish. There is a difference. — Nowhither 22:45, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.