Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sea Studios Foundation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 07:13, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sea Studios Foundation

Sea Studios Foundation (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Reads like an advert FirefoxMan 22:15, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Please Note: This article has been greatly improved since it was nominated for deletion. I think it no longer reads like an advert.--Natl1 12:47, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep I think this article should be part of Wikipedia because it is not advertising and is notable. I accepted this article from AFC. Natl1 22:21, 23 December 2006 (UTC)(USER Accepted article from AFC)
    • Comment/Question Firefoxman (talk •contribs • count) , are you indicating with the (User wrote art...) that Natl1 authored this article in discussion? Navou talk 23:32, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
  • I, Natl1, am only related to this article because I accepted it from Articles for Ceation. I did not start this debate.--Natl1 12:43, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak keep does need a lot of work, there's quite a bit out there that this company has done that's not included in the article (follow the links); if that were included, it would bring it up to par. SkierRMH,22:25, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Reads like an add, it would require a massive re-write. Recommend delete. Navou talk 22:26, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep though some rewriting needed. Johnbod 23:27, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per Johnbod. Shawn in Montreal 02:31, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.