Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seán Kearns

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snowball delete --Tone 09:09, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Seán Kearns

Seán Kearns (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article is complete nonsense. Prod tag was removed without comment. Arch dude 03:05, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm placing a speedy delete tag on this. This is a seventeen year old kid...Balloonman 03:33, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Correction 16 years old... who was active enough to gain national attention and a promotion before his 11th birthday? with no google hitsBalloonman 03:33, 11 June 2007 (UTC)\
User:Creaven07 is the person who created this page and most of the pages that he created are stubs belonging to two Gaelic sporting organizations... I question if they meet the minimum criteria for inclusion here, but have asked a person who is more familiar with those subjects to take a look at them.Balloonman 03:42, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Fails WP:BIO without WP:RS. --Evb-wiki 03:34, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
  • "Seán Kearns (born December 6, 1990 in Galway) is an Iraqi-Irish Eco-Terrorist and vegetarian who has been subject to racial abuse and a number of assasination attempts". Uh, yeah. Delete. Lankiveil 03:40, 11 June 2007 (UTC).
  • Delete WP:BOLLOCKS Bigdaddy1981 04:29, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete Sent to Iraq to procure weapons at the age of 10? Oh come on... Caknuck 04:50, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Obvious drivel. How did it even make it this far? Nick mallory 05:12, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
What I cann't understand is how the (non-admin) person who removed the SPEEDY DELETE could argue that this isn't blatant nonsense!Balloonman 06:30, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
I don't see how it meets CSD G1, either. Sensible-looking bollocks, i.e. hoaxes, are not subject to speedy for good reason. --Dhartung | Talk 07:29, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Doczilla 07:15, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, fairly obvious hoax. --Dhartung | Talk 07:29, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete: complete nonsense. --RFBailey 08:33, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.