Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scrumdiddilyumptious

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:48, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Scrumdiddilyumptious

This thing was prodded, deprodded, tagged transwiki, untagged transwiki, tagged transwiki, and then untagged transwiki again by me. Now it's got an AfD tag on it, so let's put it where it belongs -- and I don't think "where it belongs" is Wiktionary, either. TheProject 17:15, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Delete Not notable per Google with only 461 hits. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. :) Dlohcierekim 18:16, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as per WP:NEO Ydam 18:17, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Neologism that can apply to any food product, so not specific enough with anything in particular. Teke 18:18, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• "This hamburger is scrumdiddilyumptious or Your mom is Scrumdiddilyumptious." Possibly BJAODN. Aplomado ^talk 18:23, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Deletearuski. Per reasons above. PJM 18:49, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, belongs in Urban Dictionary if anywhere. Punkmorten 20:52, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Almost BJAODN. DarthVader 22:20, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Dediddlyete - Richardcavell 23:28, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

• Ha, I get it. Teke 01:43, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. This isn't the Ned Flanders Wiktionary. --Metropolitan90 02:33, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, with possible redirect to Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory (I'm not sure that Dahl used it in the book, but I'm sure it's a brand of candy in the movie.) -- Grev 02:53, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment—Did I miss something? Why is this not appropriate for Wiktionary? Also, please note that the 461 Google hits comment is misleading, as this spelling is not the most common (see Talk:Scrumdiddilyumptious). Ardric47 04:18, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Is the word cromulent enough to embiggen List of neologisms on The Simpsons? Andjam 10:54, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep If Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious can have an article, why not this word? Lady Aleena 09:50, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.