Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scrotum head

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mackensen (talk) 21:17, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Scrotum head

Proposed for speedy but not a candidate, I'm bumping it to VfD. I didn't research it and am not voting. -- Curps 01:16, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, not notable, band promo. Megan1967 02:44, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. It's incredible how these bands keep "pushing boundaries" and "defining the genre" daily. --Sn0wflake 04:11, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and re-define for describing Zionists, Nazis, and other racists.
• Delete--ZayZayEM 04:45, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. BenSamples 06:57, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Band vanity. jni 07:51, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Trilobite (Talk) 14:13, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, self-promotion. Wyss 20:23, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete --BM 20:50, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable. Carrp | Talk 20:52, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. The Scrotum Head article has "pushed the boundaries" and is "beginning to expand in new forms of" self-promotion and vanity. Zzyzx11 00:43, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• delete Yuckfoo 03:57, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with Smeghead. Mixed 03:59, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. author has removed any attempts of advertisment
• Keep. doesn't look too bad
• Keep.

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.