Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scriptnetics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:26, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Scriptnetics

Scriptnetics (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This seems to be a very good hoax, similar to the article Fibernetics, also nominated for deletion today and presumably from the same author related to Rebecca Phillips. Probably the editors of both articles have the same ip-adress. The editor here also made only this article. This article has been even more work the fibernetics article but again: Not one of the references or names in this article can be connected with this term Scriptnetics, here presented. Google gives no links of this term in connection with the people mentioned in this article. Google search for Scriptnetics and cybernetics give only references to the wikipedia article or one of the many existing clones. This fraud has been noticed by an expert in the field User:Nick Green, and further investigated by me - Mdd 09:45, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as hogwash. There is a legitimate company Scriptnetics in the Tablet PC/handwriting input field which would likely pass WP:CORP but this article has nothing to do with them. --Dhartung | Talk 11:44, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:HOAX, and per WP:NONSENSE point #2. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 15:15, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as if it is not a hoax, then it appears to be a content fork from Process control. --Gavin Collins 08:42, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete It's an indecipherable jumble of jargon with unrelated links thrown in to help make it look legitimate. A WP:SNOW candidate? -- HiEv 20:33, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.