The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted per WP:NOT and WP:SNOW. No sense being overly legalistic. FCYTravis 22:35, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete Hoax. And not in any case encyclopedic--Anthony.bradbury 22:16, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Speedy delete and so tagged, patent nonsense. NawlinWiki 22:24, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Not a speedy candidate; it is clear what it thinks it is about. However, it should still be deleted. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:25, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.