Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scouserati
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Canley (talk) 12:10, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Scouserati
Delete - disputed prod. There are no reliable sources that are about this word, rather than simply use the word. The article thus fails WP:NEO as a non-notable neologism. Otto4711 (talk) 13:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 16:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SorryGuy Talk 02:05, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NEO. The vast preponderance of the usages traceable online seem to be in, or to be dependant on, the one newspaper. Deor (talk) 04:28, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete: It "gained usage" on January 1, 2008? Wow! It's practically Old English, then. Neologism, and promotional article. Utgard Loki (talk) 20:22, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.