Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scottish Poetry Library

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW (non-admin closure). Clear consensus discusses that the subject is notable. WilliamH (talk) 19:05, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Scottish Poetry Library

Scottish Poetry Library (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Delete nothing to indicate that this library is notable. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:09, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep. Plenty of things indicating notability. Celarnor Talk to me 17:27, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. Hehe, amusing and straight to the point keep by Celarnor (talk · contribs). I also found lots of other potential sources in books and other sources in a quick search. However even if the article is to be a stub it desperately needs some work/cleanup. Cirt (talk) 17:40, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. Yeah, it's notable. Article just needs expansion and sources, that's all. KleenupKrew (talk) 10:11, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. I added a couple of cats, a reference and a 'see also'. On investigation it is quite surprisingly notable. Still needs more work but there is plenty of scope. Ben MacDuiTalk/Walk 10:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 22:58, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Good God no! Strong keep - extremely notable. How can we have pages of guff on various Z-list celebrities and "reality" tv shows, but not on serious subjects like this? --MacRusgail (talk) 14:43, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep, notable national library. Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 09:00, 30 April 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.