Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Rudden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:34, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Scott Rudden

It's a vanity article, with what looks like articles copied directly into it. So basically, it's crap. Disavian 21:12, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. -- Arnzy (Talk) 21:17, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Scientizzle 21:25, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete "For immediate release..." This is a series of press releases that fails to assert the notability of the subject. WP:BIO refers.  (aeropagitica)  21:27, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Yes, this is a press release. --Lockley 22:23, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, clearly doesn't meet WP:BIO. Gwernol 22:43, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
• For immediate delete savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 22:55, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity and NN besides. --Deville (Talk) 01:47, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 19:16, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.