Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Mingus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. GlassCobra 22:45, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Scott Mingus

Scott Mingus (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Fails WP:BIO. Unlikely to be expandable beyond a stub when original research and related material sourced from conflict of interest are removed. Closeapple (talk) 03:57, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per own nomination. 100% autobiography, complete with self-critique as "internationally recognized" and "prolific". --Closeapple (talk) 04:10, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

  See note below by subject of the article, who is also a Wikipedia editor. Still 100% WP:OR. --Closeapple (talk) 16:34, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete I see no evidence of WP:RS reliable secondary sources, let alone the "extensive coverage" required to meet WP:N. I think that Johnny Reb Gaming Society and CHARGE! (magazine) almost certainly fail WP:N as well. Pete.Hurd (talk) 04:21, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: Does not appear to meet WP:N so delete unless some sources can be provided (however those sources need to be RS). - Rjd0060 (talk) 04:45, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
• I am flattered by this article, but to set the record crystal clear, I was NOT the author of it, nor was it created with my consent or knowledge. My son wrote it thinking it would be nice to recognize my books and publications, but you may readily delete it. Scott Mingus (talk) 16:18, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.