Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scotsman guide (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 10:39, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Scotsman guide

AfDs for this article:
Articles for deletion/Scotsman guide Articles for deletion/Scotsman guide (2nd nomination)
Scotsman guide (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No assertion of notability made, written like advertisement, no refs despite being tagged for rewrite since June 2007. Delete as nom SarekOfVulcan 15:55, 18 October 2007 (UTC)Withdrawn, adding refs to main article myself.

  • Delete per nom. Wikidudeman (talk) 17:16, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete as spam. Bearian 20:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC) Agree to keep per WP:HEY. Bearian 19:54, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

refs added 61crocodile 20:29, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 09:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment - People may find this interesting. This magazine brings up lots of Google hits and has won an international award. Lradrama 12:11, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Week keep. I distrust press releases by default, but I doubt it's outright lying when it claims the magazine has been running for more than 2 decades and has a lot of readers. --Gwern (contribs) 14:59 24 October 2007 (GMT)
    • Comment -- note that I didn't say that the organization wasn't notable, just that the article didn't assert it, and a cursory Google search didn't bring up anything that didn't seem to be generated by the org itself. Given the awards, though, I withdraw the nom, and will be adding links.--SarekOfVulcan 17:23, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.