Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scotlands Shame

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete Anthony Appleyard (talk) 11:51, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Scotlands Shame

Scotlands Shame (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Unsourced neologism of no particular notability; basically an excuse to post a rant about Rangers F.C. Maybe copyright issues as well, as the article asserts that much of the text is from an un-named web forum (though I couldn't find it on Google). Prod removed without comment by IP, so let's go through the motions here for a bit... unless anyone thinks it's blatant enough to qualify as an attack page? Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 07:30, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. —Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 07:34, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. —Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 07:34, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
• This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:50, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - no encyclopaedic notability at all. - fchd (talk) 08:00, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - wholly unencyclopedic rant/attack page ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:06, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - doesn't quite qualify for WP:CSD#G10 but should certainly go per nom. JohnCD (talk) 08:47, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
• Comment moved from article's talk page:For goodness sake get this deleted. Ignoring the fact it is utter political bile, it is not even written in proper sentences, and bits of it don't even make sense, e.g. "In the late 19th century and during the second world war the Irish community struggled indefinitely" - If they struggled indefinitely, then why not say that they have struggled since the late 19th century? Nonetheless, a load of parochial nonsense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.101.156.74 (talk • contribs)

• Speedy delete as attack page; only use is to disparage its subject. -- MightyWarrior (talk) 11:03, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - A banner at a football match? Not notable and only there as an attack page. Red star (talk) 11:08, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.