Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scornacosh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Anas ^talk? 17:16, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Scornacosh

Scornacosh (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Original Research. No sources, no references, no Google hits. Hu 01:26, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Wikipedia is not a cook book Corpx 02:54, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not the grandma's recipe book. T (Formerly Known as FireSpike) 03:29, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete wikipedia is not a cook book. Oysterguitarist 04:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, no confirming GHITS, suspected hoax or very non-notable "regional" dish. --Dhartung | Talk 08:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete. Wikipedia is not a how-to guide, nor is it for unverifiable original research. Asserts notability as claims to be "considered a delicacy in certain remote spots of the Mid-Atlantic United States" so not A7 but also not verifiable.-h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 10:20, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete. Original research about something unencyclopedic. Bart133 ^{(t) (c)} 17:51, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 16:54, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.