Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scopetech

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was

Tally: I count 7 delete, 2 keep by editors whose votes count (Mrmiscellanious and Randy Johnston), 2 keep by editors with less than 50 edits (G-RaZoR and Dinero) and some anonymous votes. Ignoring the anonymous votes and the votes by editors with less than 50 edits, the votes are 7-2 to delete. I'll go delete Scopetech now. Wile E. Heresiarch 19:33, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Scopetech

Website promo. Launched last month by some television personalities. Delete. Wile E. Heresiarch 06:25, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Foobaz·✐ 06:49, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. (Probably self-) promotion. -- RHaworth 08:07, 2005 Feb 27 (UTC)
• Delete. Smells like self-promotion. Zzyzx11 20:52, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• This is not a Self Promo, I am the one who added it, and I am showing off a Tech site created by former On-Air Talents. They did not add it themselves.
  • G-RaZoR blanked this vfd and inserted the above as his ninth edit. —Korath (Talk) 07:02, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, advertisement, non-notable. —Korath (Talk) 07:02, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)
• Do Not Delete, notable exchange of tech and general information in forums. www.danielwalters.net
• Do Not Delete, Brand new exchange of current Tech information.
• Do Not Delete, It's iffy right now. I'd say keep it up for now, but think about describing it better and making it sound less like an ad. My two cents. --Mrmiscellanious 23:43, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Is notable, not self-promotion. --Randy 01:07, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. ComCat 02:12, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Gamaliel 02:17, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Do Not Delete, This is Wikipedia, we're trying to create a compendium of all human knowledge. Scpetech is something people might want or need to look up and we should keep the information we have on them. It's not like the article is making it sound any better than it really is. -- Dinero 03:21, Mar 6, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.