Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scooplive
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:03, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Scooplive
de-prodded Vanity/advertising -Obli (Talk)? 10:07, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - vanity. - Richardcavell 11:00, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as adcruft. Colonel Tom 13:30, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. OhNoitsJamieTalk 15:57, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as vanispamcruftisement. Fagstein 23:03, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Why can we talk about big companies and not small??? There is no advertising. I just want to inform the community about the company? What do I have to change then??? Thanks for your help. M.stefani (email address removed) —Preceding unsigned comment added by M.stefani (talk • contribs)
- It is advertising and not information. The purpose of you putting that article here is to make money. A company needs to be important enough before it can be here. - Richardcavell 12:19, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- I understand your point. but if I wanted to make money from this article I would have been much more agressive on the message. I also understand that you are facing a lot of messages like this. But you promote big companies and I think it is quite scary that you don't do the same for small ones. Scooplive is a new concept and I am sure it is good for an encyclopdy like Wikipedia to be up to date. Thanks for your answer. Matt —Preceding unsigned comment added by M.stefani (talk • contribs)
- You should consider reading Wikipedia:What Wikipedia Is Not to find out why your article isn't appropriate at this time. Fagstein 23:03, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- I understand your point. but if I wanted to make money from this article I would have been much more agressive on the message. I also understand that you are facing a lot of messages like this. But you promote big companies and I think it is quite scary that you don't do the same for small ones. Scooplive is a new concept and I am sure it is good for an encyclopdy like Wikipedia to be up to date. Thanks for your answer. Matt —Preceding unsigned comment added by M.stefani (talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
