Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Science fact

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was a consensus to keep. I count 2 keep, 2 merge, 2 delete. In this near-no-consensus case, the 2 merge votes can count as a keep-equivalent, therefore this is 4 keep and 2 delete. Deathphoenix 00:05, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Science fact

What's there 'ain't bad', but probably doesn't deserve an entire article to itself. Merge into Science Fiction? -- Longhair 13:12, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• So why not just merge it? — RJH 18:40, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• either Keep and expand or merge. Megan1967 22:46, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, put in WikiDictionary Tygar 06:41, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with science fiction. —Brim 17:32, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, I see no reason either to delete it or to merge it with its ...contrary. --Pgreenfinch 07:55, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Nothing to salvage here. Gamaliel 07:58, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.