Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Science and Industry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 21:01, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Science and Industry

Fails WP:RS, WP:V. No reliable sources found through Google.--M8v2 02:05, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Fails to assert notability. Fancruft.--Húsönd 03:11, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Changed my stance to Neutral, per Hahnchen.--Húsönd 15:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - I have two print sources for this from PC Zone, one of which describes it as a Half-Life classic. I removed the prod citing give me some time to add these sources, and will do in due course, but I've spent most of my Wikipedia time today on DRV. I've deprodded quite a few mods asking for some more time, I'd quite like a few more weeks to clean them up, after that, fire away. - Hahnchen 03:16, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete YAHLM (Yet Another Half-Life Mod). Good luck to Hahnchen, but this isn't notable enough to merit cleanup. Opabinia regalis 04:00, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

• Neutral then; no problem with trying to clean it up, though I'm not convinced a couple of reviews in PC Zone means notability. Opabinia regalis 06:17, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

• • Comment - The mod website hosts some press mentions. This includes 3 reviews of 3 different versions at PC Zone("Science wins again""A Half-Life Classic""Mod of the Month"). And a double page spread in some French magazine.[1][2]. This isn't just another Half-Life mod, and whereas its popularity now has waned, this was one of the most popular mods for Half-Life. It's not like I've just voted to keep every mod, far from it. - Hahnchen 04:12, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment: no opinion on keeps/deletes, haven't checked what the consensus for notability and so on is, but I justwanted to confirm that Gen4 (the "some French magazine" ,-) ) is (or was at least at that time) one of the leading French computer game magazines and not some fanzine or so. I would consider this easily a reliable and reputable source for computer games and mods. Fram 13:54, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

• Keep per Hahnchen's reliable sources. -- Dragonfiend 05:06, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Also note the brief mention here in Compter Gaming World [3], "but he leads us to suspect something a little like multiplayer Half-Life mod Science and Industry." -- Dragonfiend 06:55, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Hahnchen. --Terence Ong _{(T | C)} 08:02, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Being somewhat familiar with ol' MCL, I think this mod should stay. WVhybrid 01:48, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep This is not just any YAHLM. Delta Tango | Talk 04:59, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.