Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schyl perry

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 01:14, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Schyl perry

Not notable. Vanity. Unverfiable. Failed the Google test. No results which means it failed the IMDB test. Trying to find a speedy delete criteria but seems that VfD shall do. The creator also vandalised a movie page just to put the person's name on an article. Chill Pill Bill 22:36, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Agreed non notable. Delete. Ambush Commander 22:54, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete does not exist. freestylefrappe 22:56, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unverified/possible hoax. Surely someone honored at the white house would get some hits on Google. --Etacar11 23:06, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete even if somehow the son of a notable person as the article claims, that's all he is. Not notable on his own. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 00:48, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete this fruitage of his labor. -- BD2412 ^talk 04:56, 2005 Jun 15 (UTC)
• Delete unverifiable. JamesBurns 06:28, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as an unholy abomination in my sight. "fruitage of his labor"? Yeesh. Also, no such person. democracys 00:53, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.