The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy keep. Now a sensible article. -- RHaworth 20:02, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
There was a genuine law case with this title but this article is nonsense. -- RHaworth 19:21, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
I've made it into a stub for the actual case, and will expand it significantly shortly. BD2412talk 19:44, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.