Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schnoobalubin'

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deletealubin'. Coredesat 06:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Schnoobalubin'

AfDs for this article:
Articles for deletion/Schnoobalubin'
Schnoobalubin' (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable made-up term Tuvok[T@lk/Improve me] 19:21, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Deletealubin' as non-notable unsourced neologism. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:24, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, since I'll look dumb if I just steal 10#Hammer's term. I actually think, personally, that this is a word worthy of note, being a concept that apparently has no other word for it; however, there's no evidence that any reliable sources feel the same, which is the standard for inclusion. Powers T 19:27, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - unsourced, neologism, made up one day, and Wikipedia is not a dictionary. JohnCD (talk) 19:28, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Gosh darned cute, but (see all of the above). Psinualways forgetsto sign 19:44, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, or redirect, but are you sure there's no term for it? I think there was a phrase that described this, and it may be instead turned into a redirect to that phrases page(if it has one)Sudoku424 (talk) 02:49, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
  • No hits in either MediaWiki search or Google. Tuvok[T@lk/Improve me] 04:15, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.