Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schmuckdomain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:58, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Schmuckdomain

Schmuckdomain (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

• Non-notable neologism, see one google in English result, and only 24 total in all languages. Delete. Mak (talk) 02:58, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Schmuckdomains is an official category in Sedo.com and this question has been asked here as well. enderminh 03:07, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Dicdef - Wikipiedia is not a dictionary And this neologism only seems to exist as a category on Sedo.com. Saikokira 03:38, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Leuko 04:47, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - no verification whatsoever (statement: "Often used in the ... business", but no sources. –- kungming·2 ^(Talk) 07:14, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - unsourced, WP:ATT is policy, and dictionary definitions are better off at Wiktionary. Moreschi ^{Request a recording?} 09:29, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - PROVE that it is often used in the domain business. Kopf1988 04:42, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.