Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schmeliel echo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Kilo-Lima|(talk) 13:59, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Schmeliel echo

A textbook case of original research. According to the article, the term was made up by the author. Dforest 18:44, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete, textbook case of bad original research. Sandstein 21:29, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Research, schmesearch, it's a neologism, no source citations are provided to show any significant real use. Dpbsmith (talk) 00:46, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:BALLS, I guess. Stifle (talk) 23:18, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.