Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schizodactyly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was transwiki and delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 16:12, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Schizodactyly

Schizodactyly (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

article is nothing more than a dictionary definition and ghits are more of the same Travellingcari (talk) 05:04, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nominator. --mariusstrom 05:06, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
• Merge into hand or add refs to make encyclopedic. -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 05:14, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOT#DICT. Sting au Buzz Me... 06:08, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
• Transwiki if not already on Wiktionary, otherwise delete per WP:NOT#DICT. Redfarmer (talk) 09:32, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. WP:WINAD Rsazevedo ^msg 23:34, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

• Transwiki per Redfarmer RogueNinja_talk 08:56, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.