Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saw V

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 01:50, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Saw V

For prior related discussions, see Saw III (AfD discussion), Saw 3 (AfD discussion), Saw 3 movie (AfD discussion), and Saw IV (AfD discussion).
Saw V (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Strong Delete, and prevent recreation until further notice Lets ignore the fact that right now all this page is is a messed up incomplete template. Saw IV hasn't even come out yet. We don't know the plot about it yet or who will be in it or whatever. Yet people are starting to make articles about the fifth movie?! This fails WP:Crystal for one thing. For all we know, Saw IV could bomb (God forbid) and they wouldn't make it. The same thing happened with Saw IV's article in that people kept on starting up topics so it had to be deleted and prevented from recreation. Seeing as people are going to constantly add Saw V I request that it also be blocked until Saw IV has long been out Saw V has already gone into production. CyberGhostface 01:31, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete At least until Saw IV comes out. This is way too early Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 02:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and protect until externally verifiable information can be provided concerning the production of this movie. -- saberwyn 03:07, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete or we'll be dealing with Hammer III, Screwdriver VIII and Rototiller XXIV before you know it. Noroton 03:25, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete: Come on now, Saw III was released not that long ago. Let's go ahead and predict all the movies that might come out in the future. Add to that the page is incomplete and doesn't feature anything in the way of content -- and what is there is for Saw IV. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 04:06, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete as empty - there's nothing in this article besides an infobox that's mostly copy/pasted from Saw IV (including the IMDB link). Then protect it until Saw IV comes out. Zetawoof(ζ) 05:16, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
    • I'm gonna be bold, tag it {{db-empty}}, and see what happens. Zetawoof(ζ) 19:06, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
      • Removed: "active AfD, I'll keep it there for the moment". Oh well. Zetawoof(ζ) 23:52, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete and protect per Zetawoof. Meanwhile, I'll start work on Saw VI. :-) Realkyhick 05:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete No content. Maxamegalon2000 06:00, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete, no content or whatsoever, WP:NOT a crystal ball as well. Terence Ong 恭喜发财 08:42, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and Protect until the movie is confirmed AND their are details about it available. TJ Spyke 10:01, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete it has no content.--Cometstyles 16:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete WP:NOT a crystal ball. What happened to 4? —Ocatecir Talk 11:03, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete as A1, no context whatsoever. Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 14:25, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete. Come on, an article about a movie that not only doesn't exist yet, but might never exist? Wikipedia may be shiny, but it's not a crystal ball. :) Pyrospirit Flames Fire 16:04, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  • speedy delete under A1. Flyguy649talkcontribs 16:10, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete pending better, verifiable information The article has maybe one source (maybe) and pretty much no reliable information. Articles on future events have to be based on reliable, published info. Dugwiki 21:24, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Pending verification. Glad to see Saw IV up. It was under WP:DRV at the same time I was rescuing Playboy Online, if I recall correctly. TonyTheTiger 23:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. The article does not have any substance in it in the first place! --Nevhood 05:03, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. With Saw IV not even in production yet, how can we be sure that Saw V will ever exist? The article has only two sentences and an infobox that may give off unreliable and unconfirmed information. It's only link is to the IMDb page for Saw IV. Jack Of Hearts | Miss A Turn 01:46, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.