Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savvy Miss

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Ezeu 21:12, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Savvy Miss

Online magazine with an Alexa rank of 3.5 million. No indication of meeting WP:WEB-- GraemeL ^(talk) 16:34, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Savvy Miss is a brand new web community for women, which launched last week. Wikipedia has pages for almost all of the current women's magazines, and should therefore include Savvy Miss in its database. Savvy Miss is unique, because instead of tauting unhealthy body images, dieting, archaic beauty rituals or doing anything to make your man happy, it instead empowers and inspires women. The content encourages women to pursue careers outside the realm of more traditional female jobs and promotes nonprofit organizations and volunteering. --Missshmu 17:02, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Current press links to follow.

• MediaBistro blog [1]

--Missshmu 17:03, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

• Journalism Jobs posting [2] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Missshmu (talk • contribs) .--Missshmu 17:03, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:WEB, as per the case made by the above anon... Sandstein 17:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Yeah, "launched last week" pretty much seals the non-notable deal on this one. -- Kicking222 17:02, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:WEB and per nom.--Dakota ~ 17:02, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Don't Delete Look, this is my last attempt to save this page. You're all crazy if you want to pull a page to an up and coming web community that actually encourages women.--Missshmu 17:07, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: Actually, we do. "Up and coming" websites and the like are exactly what does not go onto Wikipedia. Please see WP:WWIN and WP:WEB. Stifle (talk) 17:19, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete glaring failure of WP:WEB too new to be notable. Please read WP:NOT Dominick ^(TALK) 17:12, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep User makes point about other women's mags pages --MikeD7759 17:13, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment list them here and they will be looked at the same way. Dominick ^(TALK) 17:28, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Just checked #s for Savvy Miss. Google ranks them a 3, They've had over 133,000 pages viewed in their first week and over 5600 unique visitors. --Missshmu 17:17, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as a "brand new" web community. There is a stark lack of reliable sources. Come back when your community site has been featured in multiple, independent, and non trivial publications, and has an alexa rank lower than 50,000. --Hetar 19:37, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, for reasons above stated. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 19:40, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above; I strongly recommend thatMissshmu consult WP:CHILL. If this online mag becomes notable, then it may merit an article. RGTraynor 20:21, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.