Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sav-way

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 03:11, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sav-way

Speedy deleted, reposted, retagged by me as repost, but really does deserve a wider audience as we shouldn't speedy companies. Abstain for this moment. brenneman^(t)(c) 09:44, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Delete - I couldn't find one Google hit for the store. Looks like a vanity page to me. If it is kept, needs to be flagged for NPOV and needs a considerable re-write. - Dharmabum420 09:48, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Delete - yeah, I speedied this, it popped up for the nth time and I was about to AfD it unitl Aaron beat me to it. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 09:50, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Doesn't seem to be verifiable, current copy seems to be a diatribe about the relative merits of the final owners and their predecessors. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 13:44, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Non notable small business. Obina 14:22, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete attack page Dlyons493 Talk 01:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
• yeah - just kill it already. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Randomzen (talk • contribs) .
  • I've offered to move this into Randomzen's user space if they want so that they can see if there is a home for any information from this article. I'll resist the urge to make an example red link of possible places it could go, per WP:BEANS.
    brenneman^(t)(c) 06:53, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.