Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saul Parkinson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete as both non-notable biography and an article which exists solely to disparage its subject. I should have just killed it instead of AfDing, and would have done if I wasn't new at this game. - Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 15:05, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Saul Parkinson

Fails WP:BIO and you feel the life force draining from you as you read it. It's cmplete bollocks from begininng to end. And the above broke my AfD helper and killed the auto sig, so now I really hate this article. - Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 16:34, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Also I've removed the unsigned votestacking votes. We had accounts whose only contributions were to this AfD trying to vote. Despicable. --Cyde Weys 2M-VOTE 16:29, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep But needs serious work --User:Wikiwkiwki333 16:32, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Note: This user is a sockpuppet and his vote does not count towards the total. His only two contributions are voting in this AfD and un-redlinking his user page. Clever little bugger. --Cyde Weys 2M-VOTE 16:40, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Correction: I'm not a sockpuppet at all I've simply just started contributing! --User:Wikiwkiwki333 16:44, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
      • AfD is a somewhat tricky process and you have to be familiar with a lot of the policy on what makes pages notable or appropriate for Wikipedia. You are evidently unfamiliar with these criteria, as as you said on your user page, you voted to keep this article because you found it funny. Wikipedia is not Uncyclopedia; Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Would you expect to find this joke article in Encyclopedia Britannica? Please reconsider your vote. I would recommend that you become more familiar with Wikipedia policy and edit some more articles before you return to AfD. --Cyde Weys 2M-VOTE 17:14, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
    • CYDE! AFD IS NOT A VOTE! You know better than to worry about whether such-and-such "counts towards the total". Furrfu. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 14:32, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, possibly speedy, nn-bio. Punkmorten 16:43, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and I'm an inclusionist! Jcuk 16:45, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment and now BJAODNed! Cyde Weys 2M-VOTE 17:07, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I marked this for speedy, when the article created as it was just full of insults and rubbish[1]. I also warned the user, who then deleted my speedy request. It is clearly an article with the intent just to get back at a friend. Grandwazir 17:58, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Both nonsense and an attack Avi 18:56, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per CSD A7 --NaconKantari 21:24, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedily delete. WP:CSD A7. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 22:54, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Pointless student vanity article. They can place this information on their own website.  (aeropagitica)  23:11, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Why is this nonsense even here? Someone please use their admin powers and speedy delete it - no assertion of notability,l obvious joke. --kingboyk 23:24, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete under A7, as per above. I tagged it as well. Sliggy 14:20, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.