Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satan Sam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 21:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Satan Sam

Not a notable company by the guidelines at WP:CORP. Tim Pierce 12:58, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Tom Harrison Talk 14:40, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as non-notable "one-man run freeware development team". No alexa traffic data for website [1]. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-03 02:30Z
  • I'm sorry but I copied over terminology from another wikipedia page based on a similar studio to my own, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallen_Angel_Industries . I used their terminology as they have a page and my previous one was deleted. Please tell me what I can do to get the same privileges as them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mull (talk • contribs)
    • Fallen Angel Industries does not look very notable either, so if you want to nominate it for deletion, go ahead. However, it does look more notable, more established, and less promotional than Satan Sam. (Wikipedians frown heavily on using Wikipedia for advertising; see WP:NOT.) Here is some more explanation why I think the Satan Sam article should be deleted. The SatanSam.co.uk website starts with "1. Blog 2. Real Site" -- that doesn't look professional. Your forums have on average 1 or 2 posts, the highest being 9 in the "off topic" forum, of the "Released games" forums only 1 forum even has any posts -- so this gives a strong impression of non-notability. Websites need Alexa rank 10,000 to be considered notable, and your website is not even ranked, meaning there are millions of websites more notable than yours. Also this article talks about upcoming games. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball; information must be verifiable. Also you should not write about yourself or your projects because it is prone to vanity and non-NPOV. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-06 03:42Z
  • Delete per Quarl - well put Werdna648T/C\@ 08:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nom. Batmanand 08:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.