Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sasha Jackson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:09, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sasha Jackson

Sasha Jackson (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

• Delete - Despite possible notability of this article... this is clearly an autobiography, and one that borders on self promotion (see WP:AUTO) - Jazznutuva 11:44, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep and improve. The subject appears notable enough; she's on imdb, for instance. The article is currently fairly awful, but there's no reason it has to stay that way. --Ashenai 11:51, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Comment - Just because she is notable enough does not mean this page should stay... if you read about the author of the page... it has been verified she is writing her own page which is discouraged under WP:AUTO. Jazznutuva 11:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

I agree with WP:AUTO, but I also feel that two wrongs don't make a right. While a (genuinely notable) person should not write an autobiography on Wikipedia, it's also not correct to delete an article about a notable person just because it's an autobiography. Most, if not all, of the factual statements in the article are readily verifiable. Wikify, source, delete unsourced or POV comments, and we'll have a perfectly accepable stub, in all likelyhood. --Ashenai 11:58, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Agree with you... but I don't think she is objective enough to continue editing it... we should delete this page and allow someone else other than the subject of the article writing it. If she continues writing this... there will always be a {{NPOV}} tag on it. Jazznutuva 13:31, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Meh, I'm not worried. Wikipedia has managed to create a stable, NPOV article on Barbara Schwarz, despite the strenuous efforts of the article's subject. Let's assume good faith. The current article is actually moderately factual and only minimally POV. I don't foresee serious problems with it. --Ashenai 12:07, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete IMDB is not an assertion of notability, key grips have IMDB pages. I could not find any reliable sources about this actress. Virtually everything I found was a profile created by her on a website. There were no independent secondary sources that could confirm her notability as needed per WP:BIO. Unless some can be produced, I think the article should be deleted. --Cyrus Andiron 12:38, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. non (yet) notable: In IMDb I find nothing notable. Additionally: WP is not a cristall ball, to many future list name (without reference). Cate | _Talk 13:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Cyrus Andiron. Non-notable self-promotion. Valrith 21:36, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete this vanispamcruftisement. MER-C 07:49, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete until her appearances in some of those movies get multiple non-trivial independent articles written about them. She has an excellent web designer, and is good about putting her photos on IMDB, yet I give you her "publicity" page from there: [1]. When she gets famous, we'll be glad to have an article for her; but our article about her shouldn't be the thing that makes her famous. --AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 16:46, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.