Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah russell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sarah Russell

Originally tagged for speedy deletion as nn bio, however the author has made claims to notability. Doing a search for Ms. Russell's book on Amazon gies a page rank of over 1,000,000. Book was printed by Lulu Press, a noted vanity press. Wildthing61476 04:34, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. While unlike many nonnotable biographical articles this one was clearly created in good faith, the subject simply doesn't rise to the level of notability suggested by WP:BIO. VoiceOfReason 04:38, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:BIO as author of "non-traditional" press book that does not meet WP:BK. --Kinu ^t/_c 04:54, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Comment, borderline for me. The claims of notability are a bit vague. Starred in Phantom of the Opera? When? Where? link? I'm thinking sources? Verifiable? Maybe she could add some of that. Wjhonson 07:03, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, so much activity, so few sources for it, fails WP:BIO completely and WP:V for most claims Fram 09:34, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Fram --Mecanismo | Talk 10:38, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, claims don't appear to be verifiable with reliable sources. Book published by a vanity press. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 02:37, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nominator. Nothing to work from. RFerreira 06:53, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.