Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Thornton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Carlossuarez46 00:23, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sarah Thornton

Sarah Thornton (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not a notable individual P0per 02:57, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete looks like a missed speedy. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 03:02, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Keep Should have checked earlier versions before. Tagged version was vandalism. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 03:06, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

*Weak delete. Regardless of vandalism, only borderline notability is asserted and it fails WP:V. Does not cite any sources. Dbromage [Talk] 03:47, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. Changed by vote on the basis of additional information below. Dbromage [Talk] 05:26, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

• Keep The article clearly needs improvement (particularly in the area of citations and references) but if the assertions of notability are correct then this subject is notable. --ElKevbo 04:35, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, over 200 Google Scholar citations, over 200 Google Books citations indicate the acceptance of her work as standards in the field. Many of these could be used as sources demonstrating notability. --Dhartung | Talk 04:38, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per Dhartung, passes WP:N. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 04:56, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

*Speedy Keep Nom has been withdrawn, nobody has countered. spazure (contribs) 06:23, 23 August 2007 (UTC) You're right, I'm an idiot. For some reason I thought Dlohcierekim was the nom. Nevermind, striking my keep vote. spazure (contribs) 06:39, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

I don't see where P0per has withdrawn the nomination. --ElKevbo 06:37, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. —David Eppstein 14:57, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.