Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Jane Adventures episodes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn - now referenced. No objections. Will ^(talk) 23:42, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Eye of the Gorgon

Eye of the Gorgon (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Also nominated:

• Warriors of the Kudlak
• Whatever Happened to Sarah Jane?
• The Lost Boy (The Sarah Jane Adventures)

Not a single item in these pages is sourced, hence it is a CRYSTAL violation. I know that the titular character will appear in the episodes, but the criteria is verifiability, not truth. Also, please don't vote "keep" because it will exist, because the argument is flawed as we don't know the titles of any of the episodes yet. Will ^(talk) 18:40, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

• Redirect to List of The Sarah Jane Adventures stories, at least until we get more infomation --OZOO (What?) 21:16, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

• I rise in opposition to Will's request. I do not believe that deletion is proper for several reasons which I will outline:

1. All relevant information pertaining to these articles HAS been sourced and are currently displayed in the articles. When I typed up the episode pages, I did so section by section. As you know, typing up new article pages is VERY time consuming. I did created a section for "Novelization" and "References." These sections were not complete at the time when I went to lunch. When I got back another user had deleted these sections. When Will saw the pages, the reference sections were already gone. So it was never intended to be the final edit, and thus it was not a "crystal" violation.
2. These articles are considered "future television episodes" and are marked as such to give the reader notice that the articles or sections contain information about a scheduled upcoming television episode and it "may contain non-definitive information based on commercials, a website or interviews" and the "information may change as the date of broadcast approaches." This is consistent with EVERY Doctor Who related upcoming episode page and I followed the same procedure with these articles.
3. Four out of five titles have been announced concerning Series 1 of The Sarah Jane Aventures. Before anyone nominates a page for deletion, it is common courtesy that they discusss the matter on the article's discussion page first. Had Will done so, he would have known that the titles have been revealed AND novelations of three of those stories are due out in November 2007 by Penguin Books. (Deej30 21:48, 26 July 2007 (UTC))

• Keep due to the points made above I see no reason these articals should be deleted, since these titles are now known, (DWM) and there is some information on the different stories, then these articals should continue to exist as long as any arguable information is refferenced. Wiggstar69 23:37, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.