The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 06:51, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
This seems to be an original work of fiction. Delete. Bo Lindbergh 15:52, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Delete Google search [1] brings back two hits, both false positives. (aeropagitica) 16:15, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Delete per above. Assertion of discovery of a tomb that was never actually completed. Also being a supposed relative of somebody famous doesn't necessarily make that individual notable.. — RJH 21:40, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Delete per above. Stifle 16:43, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.