Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sapna Babul Ka...Bidaai
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (non-admin closure), TV soap is notable. StephenBuxton (talk) 11:38, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Sapna Babul Ka...Bidaai
Uncategrise,unsourced Article For Indian Television Series Hardik Kansagra (talk) 20:23, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
KeepStrong Keep So categorize and source it! We've got articles on individual episodes of U.S. cartoons, and a daily Hindi soap opera gets put up for deletion? Dekkappai (talk) 21:52, 6 May 2008 (UTC)- OK, I categorized it and added a couple sources. In the process, I see it's not just any old TV series, but "most popular show on the channel with a TRP rating of 5.58, beating Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi at 5.25, which was the most popular show on the channel for six consecutive years." [1]. Strong, speedy keep. Dekkappai (talk) 22:24, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Dekkappai (talk) 22:55, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- I Appriciate What You Are Saying But This Article's creator Not Visited Til Creation Of This Article Or Ya I Know Well That This Show Is Now Highest TRP Show gained Then Kyuki But This Article Does Not Match The criteria to Match That These Show Is From STAR Plus Or Some User Also Removed The Categrise So I Have Waited For 7 Days To Get Edited Properly But Some User Contributed To Article But Not Refered That This Article Is Uncategrised So I Supposed This Article Has Removed Once Then I Create It With Proper Lineup Guided With Wikipedia Admin Team To Get Proper Maintained Article For This Series. Infeact Not This one I am Celecting also A Info On Not Created Page Series For STAR Plus chennel Hardik Kansagra (talk) 11:26, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, notable enough to have an article. AFDs is not the way to deal with quality issues. --Soman (talk) 13:07, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.