Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saphin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 09:36, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Saphin

delete, vanity. Melaen 20:05, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, if people are buying Google ads tied to your name, you're probably notable. Adrian Lamo · (talk) · (mail) · 20:31, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 15:09, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:41, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, 2 CDs... one self-released and unavailable... one on a minor indie label. Does not meet WP:MUSIC.--Isotope23 17:35, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, Artist was signed to a major label (warner Bros.), has won awards from such notables as Bowienet for his website SaphinScape. His website has received as many as 20,000 hits a month. Jeff Saphin has fans in many countries (Germany, Japan, France, and of course America). has been featured on "Radio America" (a 1/2 hour national broadcast hosted by Buddy Hackett's son Sandy), received rave reviews in The Village Voice (notable enough?), 1st release is STILL AVAILABLE, His Self released CD is also available and should not factor into WikipediA criteria, especially given the current climate of the music business. These, and I agree with the first * Keep : if people are buying Google ads tied to your name, you're probably notable. they are, and Saphin is. 24 pages on a QUOTED "Jeff Saphin" Google search, and that's not a common name. (Telecon)
• Keep, per my earlier reasoning. Adrian Lamo ·· 08:11, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep as barely meeting notability standards. But yikes! That article needs a cleanup, badly. At least I managed to shrink the giant image... Turnstep 20:04, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.