Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra Bradshaw

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge relevant information in United Airlines Flight 93 (already there) and delete (biography is already on Wikimemorial). Neutrality^talk 15:19, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sandra Bradshaw

Sad but WP:NOT a memorial Delete --Aranda56 00:02, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

• She and several other passengers are historically significant for fighting back against the terroists. This has been confirmed by reconstructions of the flight tapes and from cell phone conversations. I agree posting all 40 passengers would be OTT. Posting these few who fought back is relevant and material to the events on Flight 93. Note that the terrorists are given extensive bios--why not mini bios for the few who foiled their plans? Norweigan Forest 00:07, 19 September 2005 (UTC) _{- User's 18th edit. --Blackcap | talk 19:14, 19 September 2005 (UTC)}
  • What exactly is your vote? Keep? --Blackcap | talk 19:14, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• Its better off for a merge into the wiki 9/11 memorial Page not here --Aranda56 00:11, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• Merge any pertinent info to the 9/11 wiki. -GregAsche (talk) 00:37, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• Re: Norwegian Forest: At this point, the article only says it is believed that this person was notable by the standards you cite (which I would generally agree with). If the significant in foiling terrorists claim is sourced, I'd say keep. Until, delete. — Lomn | Talk / RfC 02:34, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. There's no particular evidence that this individual in particular fought back against the terrorists and in any case, Todd Beamer and United Airlines Flight 93 detail the passenger counterattack in enough detail. This article is completely unnecessary. — Phil Welch 02:37, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• Merge or delete: I think a list, which might include a mini biography, of all the passenger on UA Flight 93 would be useful — or maybe as a section in the United Airlines Flight 93 article. As is, though, IMHO it doesn't warrant its own article. — Cory Maylett 02:51, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• Merge articles on such people in the article on the flight they were on. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:46, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with an article about flight 93, maybe include all the pertanant people involved in that flight...HoratioVitero 15:49, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete The September 11th wiki already has all of this information and more here. There is nothing paticularly notable about this person, and her pages can be easily linked to on the previously mentioned wiki from the UA Flight 93 page. I recommend that references to her in the UA 93 page be simply linked to her Sep11 wiki page. --Blackcap | talk 19:24, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• Comment Relevant material: meta:What to do with entries related to September 11 casualties. --Blackcap | talk 19:28, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• Merge into United Airlines Flight 93. (Article should be re-created if section gets too big). Andrew pmk | Talk 20:55, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Many other articles on 9/11 victims onboard aircraft have been expanded — this one could be too. Andrew pmk | Talk 05:18, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to United Airlines Flight 93. Hall Monitor 19:13, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
• Merge into United Airlines Flight 93.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.