Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandhills Publishing Company

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep (2 keep, 1 delete) Wikibofh 00:11, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sandhills Publishing Company

Page is mostly cut-and-paste from their website; the bits that aren't (mainly at beginning) aren't comprehensible enough to be edited into something useful. I would have cut the plagiarised/copied stuff and made this a stub. However, I'm not convinced that there's enough of note about this publisher to warrant inclusion as a stub. Fourohfour 14:14, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

Footnote: User:211.245.243.189 (contributor) and User:Mirmo! (originator) are almost certainly the same person. Fourohfour 15:05, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

• Comment. I carried out a major cleanup involving removing all of the copyvio text and the "See also" section which consisted entirely of redlinks. I also dispute the assertion that "Sandhills Publishing Company is the most visited website on the Internet today". I don't have enough interest to verify notability, so no opinion on the AfD. --GraemeL ^(talk) 17:36, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, company seems notable enough but GraemeL was too kind in his editing and I used a somewhat larger axe. -- DS1953 05:00, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Keep; this is a very well-known publishing company with major titles; I think the stub can be expanded back into a comprehensive article without resorting to copyvio. I'll put it on my list to look in on. MCB 22:10, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

211.245.243.189 has removed the AfD tags; I have reinstated them. It's hard to tell if this user is malicious, egotistical, incompetent, or just doesn't understand English very well, as they've never responded via talk pages. Fourohfour 10:53, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

• I don't believe Mirmo has a malicious intent, I think he keeps removing tags because he doesn't properly understand English. --ApolloBoy 04:29, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
  • No, I don't think Mirmo/211.245.243.189 is outright malicious either. However, I believe that he/she/it knows enough English to at least respond. If she is confident enough to make contributions to Wikipedia, she knows enough to respond. I don't expect perfect English. I DO expect them to try. Fourohfour 11:17, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.