Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandhill Farm

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 06:41, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sandhill Farm

This is pretty much a vanity piece. A more interesting read than most vanity pieces, but says nothing to justify Sandhill Farm's importance to the wider world. Isaac R 00:31, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, not notable, promo. Megan1967 05:34, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, POV, and no real potential or use. Tho' it certainly does sound nice. --maru 00:18, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, POV, not notable, promotional Tobycat 02:32, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, POV, Promotional. An argument could be made that any commune is notable especially at this point in history but it would be a weak one. Falerin 19:03, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, HUGELY POV. "we grow our food". And this line, "Extra hands are appreciated during our growing season, especially the sorghum harvest", makes it sound like an ad/promo. Delete I say! Delete! Master Thief Garrett 22:09, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.