Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandford scotland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn with consensus to keep, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 22:55, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sandford scotland

Sandford scotland (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Just total drivel really. Polly (Parrot) 21:18, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

• Comment No question that the article as it's written is a joke but the place appears to exist. Perhaps someone from Wikipedia:WikiProject_Scotland can lend a hand to fix/merge it if it's notable. Travellingcari (talk) 21:30, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep The place certainly exists as a quick search shows. And all such places merit an article by long-standing precedent. Colonel Warden (talk) 22:00, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep. Inhabited place, therefore however poor the writing (this can be fixed) it's a keeper. Will copyedit (and move to correct title once AfD closes). Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 22:06, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
• Withdraw nomination Now that it is no longer drivel. Polly (Parrot) 22:23, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.