Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sander Cohen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Selket ^Talk 03:54, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sander Cohen

Sander Cohen (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

If this isn't a copyvio violation (it's souce is a wiki) its notability is unestablished and its source isn't reliable. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 21:42, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. It's not a copyright violation because its credited source is a GFDL-licensed wiki. On the other hand, it's not appropriate for Wikipedia per WP:FICT. The lack of context means that a substantial rewrite would be needed if this character were deemed notable enough for Wikipedia. As a second choice, redirect to the game the character comes from. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:37, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
• Redirect to Bioshock - the article itself doesn't show notability or verifiability through reliable 3rd party sources. Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:09, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep. I think this article should be kept because it does not violate copyrights and some people do not know about wikis. Also, shouldn't we perhaps notify the person who created this page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.181.46.247 (talk) 16:20, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:18, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
• This old version of the page was much less problematic. Reverting to that level of detail might be appropriate. On the whole, however, I think that a redirect to Bioshock is probably the best solution. There are no reliable sources demonstrating independent notability of this specific character. The site where the current version was copied from may technically be a wiki but the content is far more blog-like than the kind of sourced content that we want to use as a basis for an encyclopedia article. Rossami (talk) 21:27, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete – Non-notable fictional character, article is copied from Wikia. There's no real reason to have this article in Wikipedia, as it is not particularly notable for an encyclopedia, and all of the information is well covered by the Wikia wiki. — λ (talk) 16:45, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.