Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/San José Pinula

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep - clearly never going to be deleted - Peripitus (Talk) 22:21, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] San José Pinula

San José Pinula (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

It is a half-of-line stub (substub). Kubek15 - Talk, Userboxes, Contributions 11:11, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

• Keep Coincidentally, this article wasn't a half-of-line stub until 00:50 of 23 February 2008. The nomination was made later in the day. Maybe Kubek15 and AndreasJS can get together some time, since they share a common interest. Others of us will simply try to translate the article from Spanish into English, which is what the article was tagged for. Mandsford (talk) 16:41, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

• Keep Added expand tag as this article definitely has potential Carter | Talk to me 16:50, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep, we'd keep it if it were American and this is a bad faith, anti-Latin American nomination, though I notice there is no afd tag on the article and suggest this process is speedied now, there is quite simply nothing in the current article meriting deletion and the fact that somebody added Spanish text is not a reason for deletion. Thanks, SqueakBox 18:02, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 18:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep, even if it were a half-line stub. Pburka (talk) 19:12, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.