Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel francis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk 00:57, July 23, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Samuel francis

Alledged non-notable CEO of non-notable Dinsdale 5th Avenue, above. Google can't verify the connection, but if his company isn't notable, and that's his biggest claim to fame, the he's not notable. Also may be self-promotion (User:Samueldfrancis might want to take portions of the article(s) to his User page). Niteowlneils 01:10, 17 July 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. Hoax CEO of hoax company. Pburka 01:40, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete: Apparently a "web entrepeneur," if you know what I mean. No biography is warranted. Even if his company were spectacularly successful, there would be no indication that his biography is. Geogre 03:52, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
    • Comment: I disagree with that statement, and so does Jeff Bezos. Founders of spectacularly successful companies are notable. But this individual is the founder of an unsuccesful nonexistent company. Pburka 14:19, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
    • If all Bezos did was found the company, he'd not deserve a biography. However, he has done quite a lot. He has been one of the leading e-commerce cheerleaders, has innovated, has pioneered on-demand, etc. He deserves a biography because his biography is interesting and because he is referred to as a person by other sources. On the other hand, a man who hides in the shadows and runs things and just appears in trade magazines is famous only for the company, and only in the context of the company, and therefore would have his bio-article redirect to the company. Geogre 20:47, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. I agree with above comment. --Msoos 11:37, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete under the same logic as deleting the Dinsdale 5th Avenue item.Nandesuka 17:34, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete nn vanity, plus unverified. --Etacar11 00:01, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete non notable vanity. JamesBurns 03:38, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Samuel Francis, no opinion on deletion. Gazpacho 01:36, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Not important--Peterloud 13:58, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.