Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Hordern

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, Australian Dictionary of Biography entry provides notability for the article's subject. Dreadstar † 03:42, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Samuel Hordern

Samuel Hordern (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

notability? —Preceding unsigned comment added by PetraSchelm (talk • contribs)

• Delete Article fails to establish notability. archanamiya · talk 23:13, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep, notability easily established by top google result, his entry in the Australian Dictionary of Biography: [1]. Nominator should consider doing a basic google search before questioning notabililty. Jfire (talk) 03:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - article asserts notability and provides reference to Australian Dictionary of Biography. -- Whpq (talk) 12:14, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete unless citations from reliable sources are added to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 18:17, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

  Comment - so you don't think that the Australian Dictionary of Biography is a reliable source? -- Whpq (talk) 18:23, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

  More sources would be nice. Now neutral. Stifle (talk) 11:29, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

• Keep More than just a RS, which it certainly is, having an article in Aust DNB, like ODNB, has always been accepted at WP as sufficient evidence of notability. DGG (talk) 22:47, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.