Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Byun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:27, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Samuel Byun

This isn't a speedy because the article does assert notability ("Byun is an important person in this world because he is an ambassador for Christ"). However, the claims in the article are unverifiable, and I could not confirm any of these statements through Google. Furthermore, the claim to notability seems to be that he is a Christian. So am I, but that isn't enough for a Wikipedia article. Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 01:40, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete as non-notable vanity biography. I don't consider "ambassador for Christ" to be an assertion of notability, just like "I am important because I am female" would not be an assertion of notability. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-11 02:01Z
• Speedy delete Crunch 02:07, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Things like this should be speedied, despite a claim of importance, because every Christian is in a sense an "ambassador for Christ". Therefore, the claim boils down to "Byun is an important person," which doesn't count in my view. N Shar 02:13, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete - nonnotable bio. "Ambassador for Christ" simply describes his Christianity. —ERcheck @ 02:40, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete - as per all of the above. Mike 02:54, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Vanity, hoax, all of the above. Olorin28 03:50, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn bio --MONGO 05:55, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• I've tagged it as {{nn-bio}} since almost everyone except nominator seems to agree it is not an assertion of importance. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-11 08:28Z
• Speedy deleted. No assertion of notability. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:27, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.