Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samnaun (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Municipalities are always notable - that's the consensus. This article even has a quite good amount of information. If you want more sources, AFD is not the way to go. Punkmorten 07:57, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Samnaun

Samnaun (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete I am nominating this article for deletion again. No notability shown, no references, no nothing other than one line of text. This is not suitable for wikipedia. Also on the previous nonimation for this article to be deleted, there were only two votes, one for and one against. The vote was closed with only those two votes. As I understand policy to be in these cases (this could be wrong, as I'm fairly new) a consensus is needed in order to keep or delete. I don't belive any such consensus was reached, so I'm renominating this article for deletion. It was created in March 2006 and has remained in it's present state. Thank you KoshVorlon ".. We are ALL Kosh..." 18:26, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Obviously you don't see it, as you messed it up when you tried to add the deletion template again and again and again. Please fix it. -- User:Docu

After you removed the tag Moron! Fix your eyes KoshVorlon ".. We are ALL Kosh..." 19:48, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Mind WP:NPA. Punkmorten 07:57, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.