Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sammet a beer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as silly essay.  Sandstein  09:55, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sammet a beer

Sammet a beer (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Contested PROD. Non-notable neologism. Roleplayer (talk) 09:04, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Do Not Delete. The author(s) have sited references and appear to be addressing a larger issue with beer appreciation and concerns in the industry. I'm curious to know more. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.107.191.217 (talk) 16:49, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. Searching under "joseph sammet", Google finds only the article in question (surprise!) and nine (9) other apparently unrelated links. Note also that creator Kegmaster has not made any other WP contributions before or since. I'll also note that the article has not been here for long, and that it probably doesn't need to be here much longer either. Duncan1800 (talk) 09:20, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:NEO and WP:NFT. --Dhartung | Talk 09:29, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. Hoax, nonsense. Pburka (talk) 13:23, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. Obvious cruft. J.delanoygabsadds 15:21, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
  • KeepI have hear this term used in the both in the U.S. and in the U.K. so I do believe there is validity to the term. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.7.31.187 (talk) 18:58, 20 May 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.