Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samantha S. Scott

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-09 09:23Z

[edit] Samantha S. Scott

Samantha S. Scott (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Sammy S. Scott (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Image:SammyScott.JPG (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)

Everything, including the living person's full name, date and place of birth, place raised, town information, descent, family's names and information, jobs held and at what age, how and when came about, and personal beliefs, are not proven true and therefore, not liable to complete the article. I feel we owe it to this living person to have proven information before creating the article and including information not proven true. (WGAmerica 18:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC))

• I started this article as the reporter who did speak with the screenwriter for my university-based e-zine and magazine. However, I see your reasons for deletion and I don't disagree that much of the information is not proven true. Until more "proven" information is given, delete the article. (Caysonbelle 18:50, 4 March 2007 (UTC))

• Speedy delete for the comment of Caysonbelle (creator of article). Carlosguitar 22:27, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete as above. This person fails WP:BIO and WP:ATT, so would not survive in any case. --Dhartung | Talk 23:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per Dhartung and Caysonbelle Alf^Photoman 23:48, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.