Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Thomas

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 14:31, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sam Thomas

Vanity. Delete. cesarb 02:27, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Vanity and horribly written. Couldn't you at least make an effort when you're vandalizing? Preisler 03:18, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. This looks more like someone trying to embarass Mr. Thomas. JoaoRicardo 03:37, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Funny for the first few sentences, but obviously doesn't belong here. Android79 05:01, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 06:11, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, can't people spell anymore? -- Riffsyphon1024 06:13, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity, not notable, and currently needs to go through a spell checker. Zzyzx11 06:47, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Gibberish. jni 11:54, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity. utcursch 13:31, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.